The politics of energy is at a crossroads, moving away from conventional, renewable energy, to the media! Each individual is taken from the motto "decentralization instead of centralization in the responsibility. Endless encouragement from all sides for renewable energy systems, energy requirements to "produce" on the ground are getting louder and politicians (no matter what level, and party) to jump to the new "eco-train" and get hold of as cheap votes. A call for all visible and inescapable truth is simply telling argument. There is talk of bridging technologies, offshore wind farms and solar farms in the vast desert, the whole world to provide clean power. But it is precisely these points are an indication for how much we still stuck in "old-age energy" and how far are we from being able to start the new one.
With all the good intentions and thoughts of the energy from renewable sources but come on significant political, economic and social resistance: The Parliament usually lack the courage to adopt forward-looking legislation. A ton of coal or uranium can be marketed as a convenient natural resources such as wind, water or sun.
the part of the Citizens ostensibly extends the strong support of many citizens for "renewables" do not often come into their own community. St. Florian often prevents serious discussion! promote
The basic idea is the development of renewables, of course, exemplary and highly commendable. Only this is only a necessary and sufficient condition for the complete change.
Our entire power supply is designed for a central supply, from the Implementation and operation to infrastructure. The paradox is that the energy provided centrally, but needed locally by citizens. One need not be expert to see that there is already considerable need for improvement here.
Until infrastructure and consumption behavior can be switched to a decentralized supply bribe the schemes available only through its symbolism, but not by their environmental and economic benefits. More threadbare discussions are therefore futile. A possible alternative would be for example the formation of small intentional communities to energy supply in residential areas, but especially the "natural energy" of the renewable sources accelerate and stray from the plan: Wind power in the north, solar energy in the desert, etc. Such approaches constricted to quickly a tight corset and prevents the real decentralization .
The project novel concepts in the existing, old infrastructure one to take on a like trying a modern sports cars using wooden wagon wheels to do.
We may not have a memory issue or a deployment problem but rather a distribution problem! This Engstellte it does happen.
is energy supply to 100% from renewable sources no daydreaming, no utopia! Advanced arguments such as lack of efficiency, high current price, unknown effects on humans and animals (especially in tourist areas), your personal sense of taste can not hide the fear and lack of courage of change.
energy supplies to each individual and each formed their own opinion. This is desirable in a democracy. Unfortunately, opinion is not always synonymous with a clue. In an open and honest discussion can also be ignorance, not a counter argument, but rather the incentive to find new solutions. A project can not fail to be a promising idea due to pseudo-arguments before any of the technical and economic facts have been clarified.
The more we understand that the source of energy is not the outlet, but nature itself, the more we actually move to the "age of renewables added.
Author: Konrad Baur
0 comments:
Post a Comment