The politics of energy is at a crossroads, moving away from conventional, renewable energy, to the media! Each individual is taken from the motto "decentralization instead of centralization in the responsibility. Endless encouragement from all sides for renewable energy systems, energy requirements to "produce" on the ground are getting louder and politicians (no matter what level, and party) to jump to the new "eco-train" and get hold of as cheap votes. A call for all visible and inescapable truth is simply telling argument. There is talk of bridging technologies, offshore wind farms and solar farms in the vast desert, the whole world to provide clean power. But it is precisely these points are an indication for how much we still stuck in "old-age energy" and how far are we from being able to start the new one.
With all the good intentions and thoughts of the energy from renewable sources but come on significant political, economic and social resistance: The Parliament usually lack the courage to adopt forward-looking legislation. A ton of coal or uranium can be marketed as a convenient natural resources such as wind, water or sun.
the part of the Citizens ostensibly extends the strong support of many citizens for "renewables" do not often come into their own community. St. Florian often prevents serious discussion! promote
The basic idea is the development of renewables, of course, exemplary and highly commendable. Only this is only a necessary and sufficient condition for the complete change.
Our entire power supply is designed for a central supply, from the Implementation and operation to infrastructure. The paradox is that the energy provided centrally, but needed locally by citizens. One need not be expert to see that there is already considerable need for improvement here.
Until infrastructure and consumption behavior can be switched to a decentralized supply bribe the schemes available only through its symbolism, but not by their environmental and economic benefits. More threadbare discussions are therefore futile. A possible alternative would be for example the formation of small intentional communities to energy supply in residential areas, but especially the "natural energy" of the renewable sources accelerate and stray from the plan: Wind power in the north, solar energy in the desert, etc. Such approaches constricted to quickly a tight corset and prevents the real decentralization .
The project novel concepts in the existing, old infrastructure one to take on a like trying a modern sports cars using wooden wagon wheels to do.
We may not have a memory issue or a deployment problem but rather a distribution problem! This Engstellte it does happen.
is energy supply to 100% from renewable sources no daydreaming, no utopia! Advanced arguments such as lack of efficiency, high current price, unknown effects on humans and animals (especially in tourist areas), your personal sense of taste can not hide the fear and lack of courage of change.
energy supplies to each individual and each formed their own opinion. This is desirable in a democracy. Unfortunately, opinion is not always synonymous with a clue. In an open and honest discussion can also be ignorance, not a counter argument, but rather the incentive to find new solutions. A project can not fail to be a promising idea due to pseudo-arguments before any of the technical and economic facts have been clarified.
The more we understand that the source of energy is not the outlet, but nature itself, the more we actually move to the "age of renewables added.
Author: Konrad Baur
 |
| Embroidery "Spielgelwald" by Huups! |
misunderstood youth protection combined with government regulation mania
responsible for child protection welfare state secretary, Markus Sackmann has recently issued a policy to curb crime and alcohol abuse among Alkohleinfluss to fight by minors.
The core element is to be enforced a curfew throughout Bavaria. Currently there is a so-called Shine fünf und sechs clock hour between the morning.
live in Bavaria free and responsible citizens and role models for Europe and the world.
your own responsibility they owe their education and their state system.
subsidiarity and the possibility of self-expression is written in the Free State has always been great.
Only those who get the chance, can grow to know his limits itself to a responsible citizen. This includes the freedom of leisure activities.
This is fully applicable, while others will not be affected. Personal freedom ends only where they violated the freedom of others.
must therefore be nocturnal sleep disturbance and crime under the influence of alcohol prevented at all costs. Rightly, there are sharp laws which legitimize the police to crack down to protect innocent bystanders.
The State has a responsibility, especially for its growing citizens and must create rules and regulations of the framework conditions for our cooperation. Minors are therefore not allowed after midnight to be away from home. The procurement and Consumption of hard alcohol is strictly prohibited. Under 16 years of alcohol use is even prohibited altogether. There are already so clearly defined limits to protect third and adolescents.
a Bavaria-wide curfew but punished the vast majority of responsible young adults, because a minority does not comply with existing rules. threatens the freedom of many innocent people are severely restricted by this misconduct of the few culprits.
We Do not fool us!
The few violent rioters and irresponsible binge drinkers will pursue their "hobby" will continue, no matter what Time or what place.
The curfew, however, leads to a shift of attention. The trend, station squares, city parks, garages, shelters and bus stops at night to use as a control-free space for celebration, will increase significantly. This shift, however, creates a lot more serious problems!
For the police it would be much easier to monitor a few central hub. Serious night clubs are guided by trained bar staff and ensure responsible and trained Secourity forces for maximum safety. Not least, the number of revelers ensures a mutual "social control" that can not be underestimated be allowed.
It is once again trying to alleviate symptoms rather than tackle the problem at its root.
The reasons why minors drink themselves into delirium and young adults take brawling and thrashing through the streets must be identified and removed. State prevention activities in schools and clubs or commitments for the night clubs are just a few of the many possible consequences.
A curfew does not contribute to the improvement of the situation. It restricts the company only further into the free shaping of their lives. At the core problem, but it slid by skillfully.
The initiative is nothing more than populist activism and government regulation mania!
Mr. Sackmann's work appears as a protection of young people see it alone, Bavaria to protect corrupt youth. Yet his task is the protection of minors against governmental arbitrariness!
